United States v. Stewart

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Stewart. Read the opinion of the Court — 312 F. App'x 557
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 16, 2009·No. 09-7138·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7138

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

KOJI S. STEWART, a/k/a Bling,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, District Judge. (3:05-cr-00104-FDW-DSC-5)

Submitted: September 10, 2009 Decided: September 16, 2009

Before KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Koji S. Stewart, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Koji S. Stewart appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence filed

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We find no

reversible error in the district court’s denial of Stewart’s

motion, and we thus affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. United States v. Stewart, No. 3:05-cr-00104-

FDW-DSC-5 (W.D.N.C. June 9, 2009). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Stewart, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Stewart (United States v. Stewart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related