United States v. Stewart

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Stewart. Read the opinion of the Court — 256 F.3d 231
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 6, 2000·No. 00-6971·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6971

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ROBERT HENRY STEWART, JR., a/k/a Robert Abney, a/k/a Robert Stewart, Chief, a/k/a Champ Stewart,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge; Charles E. Simons, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-96-1, CA-99- 300-1-22)

Submitted: November 30, 2000 Decided: December 6, 2000

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Henry Stewart, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Dean Arthur Eichelberger, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Robert Henry Stewart, Jr., seeks to appeal the district

court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255

(West Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the rea-

soning of the district court. United States v. Stewart, Nos. CR-

96-1; CA-99-300-1-22 (D.S.C. June 28, 2000). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Stewart, (4th Cir. 2000).

United States v. Stewart (United States v. Stewart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related