United States v. Stewart

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Stewart. Read the opinion of the Court — 256 F.3d 231
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 7, 2000·No. 00-6701·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6701

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

WARREN STEWART, a/k/a Ron Stewart,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CR-91-89, CA-98-82)

Submitted: August 30, 2000 Decided: September 7, 2000

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Warren Stewart, Appellant Pro Se. Samuel Gerald Nazzaro, Jr., As- sistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Warren Stewart seeks to appeal the district court’s order

dismissing his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2000) as time-barred. We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate

judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer-

tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. See United States v. Stewart, Nos. CR-91-

89; CA-98-82 (N.D.W. Va. May 10, 2000). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Stewart, (4th Cir. 2000).

United States v. Stewart (United States v. Stewart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related