United States v. Stevens

10 C.M.A. 417, 10 USCMA 417, 27 C.M.R. 491, 1959 CMA LEXIS 296, 1959 WL 3655
CourtUnited States Court of Military Appeals
DecidedMay 15, 1959
DocketNo. 11,871
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 10 C.M.A. 417 (United States v. Stevens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Military Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Stevens, 10 C.M.A. 417, 10 USCMA 417, 27 C.M.R. 491, 1959 CMA LEXIS 296, 1959 WL 3655 (cma 1959).

Opinions

Opinion of the Court

HomeR FeRGüson, Judge:

Appellant filed a petition for grant of review before this Court on June 27, 1958. Thereafter, in lieu of a reply to the petition for grant of review, ap-pellee filed a motion to remand admitting the court-martial lacked jurisdiction because the record reflected appointment of only four of the members who sat, whereas Ax-ticle 16(1), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 816(1), requires a minimum of five.

On August 5, 1958, this Court granted appellee’s motion “to remand the above entitled case to The Judge Advocate General of the Navy for return to the convening authority for a new trial, if practicable.” Acting pursuant thereto, the convening, authority promulgated a supplementary court-martial order, dated August 26, 1958, declaring the findings and sentence invalid and stating, “Another trial is ordered before another court-martial to be hereafter designated.” This Court, on October 23, 1958, denied appellee’s petition for reconsideration of its Order of August 5, 1958. This petition had been filed upon discovery of an order appointing the fifth member of the court. Subsequent pur-ported actions of the con-vening authority in the case were contrary to the Order of this court and void and of no effect.1

Inasmuch as this Court has heretofore issued an Order which must be complied with, the present motion of appellant-accused to remand is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Barry
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2018
United States v. Carter
Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals, 2016
United States v. Rose
Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals, 2014
United States v. McMurrin
72 M.J. 697 (Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals, 2013)
United States v. Niles
52 M.J. 716 (Army Court of Criminal Appeals, 2000)
United States v. Montesinos
28 M.J. 38 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1989)
United States v. Johnson
5 M.J. 658 (U.S. Army Court of Military Review, 1978)
United States v. Renfroe
3 M.J. 790 (U.S. Army Court of Military Review, 1977)
United States v. Sims
3 M.J. 671 (U.S. Army Court of Military Review, 1977)
United States v. Cabatic
2 M.J. 985 (U.S. Army Court of Military Review, 1976)
United States v. Cox
22 C.M.A. 69 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1972)
United States v. Hart
19 C.M.A. 438 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1970)
United States v. McLaughlin
18 C.M.A. 61 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1968)
United States v. Yaeger
15 C.M.A. 226 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1965)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 C.M.A. 417, 10 USCMA 417, 27 C.M.R. 491, 1959 CMA LEXIS 296, 1959 WL 3655, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-stevens-cma-1959.