United States v. Stevens

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Stevens. Read the opinion of the Court — 167 F. App'x 949
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 17, 2008·No. 08-7008·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7008

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DELTON SCOTT STEVENS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (7:90-cr-00310-GRA-1)

Submitted: October 14, 2008 Decided: October 17, 2008

Before KING, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Delton Scott Stevens, Appellant Pro Se. David Calhoun Stephens, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Delton Scott Stevens appeals the district court’s

order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000) motion for

reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. United States v. Stevens, No.

7:90-cr-00310-GRA-1 (D.S.C. June 3, 2008). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Stevens, (4th Cir. 2008).

United States v. Stevens (United States v. Stevens) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related