United States v. Stevens
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7008
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DELTON SCOTT STEVENS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (7:90-cr-00310-GRA-1)
Submitted: October 14, 2008 Decided: October 17, 2008
Before KING, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Delton Scott Stevens, Appellant Pro Se. David Calhoun Stephens, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Delton Scott Stevens appeals the district court’s
order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000) motion for
reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. Stevens, No.
7:90-cr-00310-GRA-1 (D.S.C. June 3, 2008). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Stevens (United States v. Stevens) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.