United States v. Stephenson

375 F. App'x 352
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 21, 2010·No. No. 08-6701·Published

Opinion

Vacated and remanded by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael D. Stephenson appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006), and motions for clarification and reconsideration. In light of our recent decision in United States v. Stewart, 595 F.3d 197 (4th Cir.2010), we vacate the district court’s orders and remand for further proceedings consistent with Stewart. [353]*353We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

VACATED AND REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Stephenson, 375 F. App'x 352 (4th Cir. 2010).

375 F. App'x 352 (United States v. Stephenson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Stewart
595 F.3d 197 (Fourth Circuit, 2010)