United States v. Stephens

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Stephens. Read the opinion of the Court — 257 F. App'x 611
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 4, 2010·No. 10-6154·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6154

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

LORENZO DESHON STEPHENS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:06-cr-00281-HEH-1)

Submitted: April 29, 2010 Decided: May 4, 2010

Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lorenzo Deshon Stephens, Appellant Pro Se. Roderick Charles Young, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Lorenzo Deshon Stephens appeals the district court’s

order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. See United States v.

Stephens, No. 3:06-cr-00281-HEH-1 (E.D. Va. Dec. 10, 2009). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Stephens, (4th Cir. 2010).

United States v. Stephens (United States v. Stephens) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related