United States v. Stephen

75 F. App'x 210
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 25, 2003·No. 03-6644·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Levy Samuel Stephen seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We vacated and remanded a previous order, finding the district court erred by summarily denying Stephen’s claim that he received ineffective assistance of counsel. Upon remand, the district court held an evidentiary hearing and again denied relief. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Stephen has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 1040, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Stephen, 75 F. App'x 210 (4th Cir. 2003).

75 F. App'x 210 (United States v. Stephen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Miller-El v. Cockrell
537 U.S. 322 (Supreme Court, 2003)