United States v. Stanert

769 F.2d 1410
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedAugust 28, 1985
DocketNo. 84-5128
StatusPublished
Cited by57 cases

This text of 769 F.2d 1410 (United States v. Stanert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Stanert, 769 F.2d 1410 (9th Cir. 1985).

Opinion

ORDER

The opinion in this case, which was filed June 5, 1985, 762 F.2d 775, is amended by adding a footnote 1 at the end of the third full paragraph in Part III, at p. 780, beginning, “In his motion for an evidentiary hearing before the district judge____” Footnote 1 shall read:

The question whether a defendant has made a sufficient preliminary showing to entitle him to a Franks [v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154, 98 S.Ct. 2674, 57 L.Ed.2d 667 (1978)] hearing is reviewable de novo. United States v. Ritter, 752 F.2d 435, 439 (9th Cir.1985).

As amended, the panel has unanimously voted to deny the petition for rehearing. The mandate shall issue in accordance with Fed.R.App.P. 41(a).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Ellis
270 F. Supp. 3d 1134 (N.D. California, 2017)
United States v. Shayota
186 F. Supp. 3d 1052 (N.D. California, 2016)
United States v. Jewel Aquino
794 F.3d 1033 (Ninth Circuit, 2015)
Frimmel v. Hon. sanders/state
338 P.3d 972 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2014)
United States v. Charles Perkins
583 F. App'x 796 (Ninth Circuit, 2014)
United States v. Martin Ruiz
758 F.3d 1144 (Ninth Circuit, 2014)
United States v. James Allen, II
481 F. App'x 308 (Ninth Circuit, 2012)
United States v. Chancey Fuller
469 F. App'x 514 (Ninth Circuit, 2012)
Bravo v. City of Santa Maria
665 F.3d 1076 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)
Chism v. Washington State
661 F.3d 380 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)
United States v. Garcia
809 F. Supp. 2d 1165 (N.D. California, 2011)
Crowe v. County of San Diego
593 F.3d 841 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)
United States v. Dais
101 F. App'x 669 (Ninth Circuit, 2004)
Butler v. Elle
281 F.3d 1014 (Ninth Circuit, 2002)
Liston v. County of Riverside
120 F.3d 965 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)
United States v. Taylor
931 F. Supp. 1447 (N.D. Indiana, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
769 F.2d 1410, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-stanert-ca9-1985.