United States v. Standard Accident Insurance

257 F.2d 78
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedJuly 8, 1958
DocketNo. 12578
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 257 F.2d 78 (United States v. Standard Accident Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Standard Accident Insurance, 257 F.2d 78 (3d Cir. 1958).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this action under the Miller Act, 49 Stat. 793, 40 U.S.C.A., § 270a et seq., a subcontractor seeks to recover on the special bond which the statute requires principal contractors to furnish. It is admitted that the complaint was filed more than a year after the date of final settlement of the prime contract as certified by the Comptroller General, despite the express provision of the Miller Act that “ * * no such suit shall be commenced after the expiration of one year after the date of final settlement of such contract.” 40 U.S.C.A. § 270b(b). The district court properly held that this suit is barred by the statutory time limitation. Accord, United States for Use of Soda v. Montgomery, 3 Cir., 1958, 253 F.2d 509; Peerless Casualty Co. v. United States, 1 Cir., 1957, 241 F.2d 811.

Judgment will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
257 F.2d 78, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-standard-accident-insurance-ca3-1958.