United States v. Stacey C. Koon, United States of America v. Laurence M. Powell
This text of 6 F.3d 561 (United States v. Stacey C. Koon, United States of America v. Laurence M. Powell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
ORDER
The Order and Dissents filed September 24, 1993, as amended October 1, 1993, are designated for publication.
The panel has voted to deny appellants’ petitions for rehearing and to reject the suggestions for rehearing en banc.
The full court was advised of the suggestions for rehearing en banc. An active judge [562]*562requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed.R.App.P. 35.
The petitions for rehearing are denied and the suggestions for rehearing en banc are rejected.
Judges Reinhardt, Kozinski and Noonan dissent from the failure of the court to rehear the ease en banc. Judge Rymer separately concurs in the decision of the court not to rehear the case en banc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
6 F.3d 561, 1993 WL 387277, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-stacey-c-koon-united-states-of-america-v-laurence-m-ca9-1993.