United States v. Spencer
This text of United States v. Spencer (United States v. Spencer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-8083
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
GODFREY LLEWELLYN SPENCER,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (7:91-cr-00138-jct-9)
Submitted: January 15, 2009 Decided: January 26, 2009
Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Godfrey Llewellyn Spencer, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Ray Wolthuis, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Godfrey Llewellyn Spencer appeals the district court’s
order granting relief on his motion for reduction of sentence
filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). As Spencer
received the relief he sought, and we find no reversible error
in the granting of Spencer’s motion, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. United States v. Spencer, No.
7:91-cr-00138-jct-9 (W.D. Va. Sept. 12, 2008). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Spencer, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-spencer-ca4-2009.