United States v. Spencer

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Spencer

21 F. App'x 178

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Spencer. Read the opinion of the Court — 63 F. App'x 723 →

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 29, 2001·No. 01-7051·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Eric Dewayne Spencer appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for new trial and subsequent motion for reconsideration of that denial. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Spencer, No. CR-99-12 (S.D.W.Va. Apr. 30 & June 4, 2001). We further deny Spencer’s motions for injunctive relief and for designation of records. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Eric Dewayne Spencer appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for new trial and subsequent motion for reconsideration of that denial. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Spencer, No. CR-99-12 (S.D.W.Va. Apr. 30 & June 4, 2001). We further deny Spencer’s motions for injunctive relief and for designation of records. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Spencer, 21 F. App'x 178 (4th Cir. 2001).

Pincite

21 F. App'x 178 (United States v. Spencer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.