United States v. Spencer
This text of United States v. Spencer (United States v. Spencer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6138
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
ERIC DEWAYNE SPENCER, a/k/a High School,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Charles H. Haden II, Chief District Judge. (CR-99-12)
Submitted: June 4, 2002 Decided: June 18, 2002
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eric Dewayne Spencer, Appellant Pro Se. Monica Kaminski Schwartz, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Eric Dewayne Spencer appeals the district court’s order
denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(b) motion to present federal
questions. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to
proceed in forma pauperis and affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. United States v. Spencer, No. CR-99-12 (S.D.W. Va.
Jan. 2, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Spencer, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-spencer-ca4-2002.