United States v. Spearman

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 9, 2008·No. 07-7521·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7521

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JESSE LEON SPEARMAN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:05-cr-00057)

Submitted: March 17, 2008 Decided: July 9, 2008

Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jesse Leon Spearman, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Everett James, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Jesse Leon Spearman appeals the district court’s order

denying Spearman’s untitled motion seeking relief from his

sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court, without prejudice to Spearman’s ability to file a

motion in the district court to modify his sentence pursuant to 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000). United States v. Spearman, No. 3:05-

cr-00057 (E.D. Va. Sept. 25, 2007); see also Kimbrough v. United

States, 128 S. Ct. 558 (2007). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Spearman, (4th Cir. 2008).

United States v. Spearman (United States v. Spearman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kimbrough v. United States
552 U.S. 85 (Supreme Court, 2007)