United States v. Solomon

200 F. App'x 315
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 14, 2006
Docket05-10633
StatusUnpublished

This text of 200 F. App'x 315 (United States v. Solomon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Solomon, 200 F. App'x 315 (5th Cir. 2006).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Teddy Wayne Solomon, federal prisoner #25882-077, appeals the district court’s denial of his supplemental 18 U.S.C. § 3582 motion to modify his term of imprisonment. Solomon’s motion challenging the constitutionality of his sentence, which was filed after the conclusion of his direct appeal and 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion, is an unauthorized motion. See United States v. Early, 27 F.3d 140, 142 (5th Cir.1994). Accordingly, Solomon’s appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Darrell Early
27 F.3d 140 (Fifth Circuit, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
200 F. App'x 315, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-solomon-ca5-2006.