United States v. Solomon

Fifth Circuit

United States v. Solomon

200 F. App'x 315

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided September 14, 2006·No. 05-10633·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Teddy Wayne Solomon, federal prisoner #25882-077, appeals the district court’s denial of his supplemental 18 U.S.C. § 3582 motion to modify his term of imprisonment. Solomon’s motion challenging the constitutionality of his sentence, which was filed after the conclusion of his direct appeal and 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion, is an unauthorized motion. See United States v. Early, 27 F.3d 140, 142 (5th Cir.1994). Accordingly, Solomon’s appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM: *

Teddy Wayne Solomon, federal prisoner #25882-077, appeals the district court’s denial of his supplemental 18 U.S.C. § 3582 motion to modify his term of imprisonment. Solomon’s motion challenging the constitutionality of his sentence, which was filed after the conclusion of his direct appeal and 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion, is an unauthorized motion. See United States v. Early, 27 F.3d 140, 142 (5th Cir.1994). Accordingly, Solomon’s appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

United States v. Solomon, 200 F. App'x 315 (5th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

200 F. App'x 315 (United States v. Solomon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related