United States v. Snipe

547 F. App'x 244
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Snipe. Read the opinion of the Court — 443 F. App'x 823
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 26, 2013·No. No. 13-7448·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Lamar Snipe appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reconsider the court’s previous denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 235-36 (4th Cir.2010) (district court does not have authority to reconsider prior order on § 3582 motion). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Snipe, 547 F. App'x 244 (4th Cir. 2013).

547 F. App'x 244 (United States v. Snipe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Goodwyn
596 F.3d 233 (Fourth Circuit, 2010)