United States v. Smyth
This text of 72 F.3d 1433 (United States v. Smyth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Dissent by Judge NOONAN; Dissent by Judge REINHARDT.
The panel has voted to deny appellee’s petition for rehearing and to reject the suggestion for rehearing en banc.
The full court was advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc. An active judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes in favor of en banc consideration. Fed.R-App.P. 35.
The petition for rehearing is denied and the suggestion for rehearing en banc is rejected.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
72 F.3d 1433, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 146, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 162, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-smyth-ca9-1996.