United States v. Smyth
72 F.3d 1433, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 146, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 162
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided January 5, 1996·No. No. 94-10495·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinions
Dissent by Judge NOONAN; Dissent by Judge REINHARDT.
The panel has voted to deny appellee’s petition for rehearing and to reject the suggestion for rehearing en banc.
The full court was advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc. An active judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes in favor of en banc consideration. Fed.R-App.P. 35.
The petition for rehearing is denied and the suggestion for rehearing en banc is rejected.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Smyth, 72 F.3d 1433, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 146, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 162 (9th Cir. 1996).
72 F.3d 1433 (United States v. Smyth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.