United States v. Smith

108 F. App'x 220
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided September 23, 2004·No. 03-41332·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Counsel appointed to represent Albert Smith, III, has requested leave to with *221 draw from this appeal and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Smith has filed a response and a supplemental response.

Our independent review of counsel’s brief, Smith’s response and supplemental response, and the record discloses no non-frivolous issues for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Smith, 108 F. App'x 220 (5th Cir. 2004).

108 F. App'x 220 (United States v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)