United States v. Smith
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-51052 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
LAFREDRICK DONTAI SMITH, also known as LaFredrick Donta Smith,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. W-01-CR-38-ALL -------------------- June 18, 2002
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS and, EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
LaFredrick Smith appeals his sentence following his guilty
plea to possession with the intent to distribute crack cocaine.
He argues that the district court erred in denying him credit for
acceptance of responsibility pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1.
Challenges to the denial of a U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1 reduction are
reviewed even more deferentially than a pure “clearly erroneous”
standard, United States v. Gonzales, 19 F.3d 982, 983 (5th Cir.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 01-51052 -2-
1994), and the defendant has the burden of proof, United States
v. Tremelling, 43 F.3d 148, 152 (5th Cir. 1995). We find that
the district court was aware that it had the discretion to award
Smith credit for acceptance of responsibility despite enhancing
his sentence pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3C1.1 for obstructing
justice. We further hold that the district court did not err in
refusing to award Smith a U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1 credit, because his
case was not an “extraordinary” one under which adjustments
pursuant to U.S.S.G. §§ 3C1.1 and 3E1.1 might apply. See
U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1, comment. (n. 4).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Smith (United States v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.