United States v. Smith

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Smith. Read the opinion of the Court — 66 F.3d 319
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 15, 1998·No. 97-40138·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-40138 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DAMON MITCHELL SMITH,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:96-CR-64-1 - - - - - - - - - - April 10, 1998

Before JOLLY, JONES, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Counsel for Damon Mitchell Smith has filed a brief as

required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), alleging

that there are no meritorious issues for appeal. Our independent

review of the briefs and record discloses no issue of arguable

merit. Therefore, the motion of counsel to withdraw is GRANTED,

and the appeal is DISMISSED. 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Smith, (5th Cir. 1998).

United States v. Smith (United States v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)