United States v. Smith

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Smith. Read the opinion of the Court — 7 F.3d 1164
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided July 25, 1996·No. 95-40681·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-40681 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

BETTY ANN SMITH,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:94-CR-147-2 - - - - - - - - - - July 16, 1996

Before JOLLY, JONES and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appellant appeals the sentence imposed by the district court

after she pleaded guilty to conspiracy to sell a firearm to a

convicted felon. Appellant contends that the district court

erred in increasing her offense level under U.S. Sentencing

Guidelines § 2K2.1(b)(1) based on its finding that the offense

involved nine firearms. Appellant also contends that the

district court erred in increasing her offense level under

U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(5) based on its finding that appellant knew

* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. 95-40681 - 2 -

or had reason to believe that the firearms would be used in

connection with another felony offense. We have reviewed the

record and find no clear error in the district court’s findings

on which it based its sentencing determinations. Accordingly, we

affirm for essentially the reasons stated by the district court

during the sentencing hearing.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Smith, (5th Cir. 1996).

United States v. Smith (United States v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.