United States v. Smith

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Smith

606 F. App'x 119

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 30, 2015·No. No. 15-6394·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Tyrone Lamont Smith appeals the dis-' trict court’s order denying relief on his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 4Bl.l(b). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Tyrone Lamont Smith appeals the dis-' trict court’s order denying relief on his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 4Bl.l(b). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Smith, 606 F. App'x 119 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

606 F. App'x 119 (United States v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related