United States v. Smith

10 F. App'x 182
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 29, 2001·No. 01-6370·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Randy Smith appeals from the district court’s orders: (1) dismissing without prejudice his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000) motion for failure to obtain authorization pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 2244 (West 1994 & Supp.2000); and (2) denying his motion for reconsideration of that order. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Smith v. United States, Nos. CR-96-327-4; CA-00-3658-8-13 (D.S.C. Jan. 19 & Feb. 14, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Smith, 10 F. App'x 182 (4th Cir. 2001).

10 F. App'x 182 (United States v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related