United States v. Smith

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6752

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ROY SMITH,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CR-89-196-A, CA-90-1157)

Submitted: August 13, 1998 Decided: September 4, 1998

Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roy Smith, Appellant Pro Se. William Neil Hammerstrom, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

his motion to reinstate his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp.

1998) motion, which was dismissed without prejudice in 1991. We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no abuse of discretion. See In re Burnley, 988 F.2d 1, 2-3 (4th

Cir. 1992). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability

and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

United States v. Smith, No. CR-89-196-A (E.D. Va. Apr. 10, 1998).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-

tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED