United States v. Smarr

207 F. App'x 499
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedDecember 5, 2006
Docket05-40391
StatusUnpublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 207 F. App'x 499 (United States v. Smarr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Smarr, 207 F. App'x 499 (5th Cir. 2006).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Michael Alan Smarr appeals his conviction for transporting illegal aliens for the purpose of commercial advantage or private financial gain in violation of 8 U.S.C. *500 § 1324(a)(l)(A)(ii) and (a)(l)(B)(I). Smarr argues that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction because the evidence did not establish that he committed the offense for the purpose of commercial advantage or private financial gain. We conclude that the evidence was sufficient to establish that Smarr participated in an illegal alien smuggling operation and that members of the operation received sums of money to help the illegal aliens enter the United States illegally and travel within the United States. The evidence was sufficient to support Smarr’s conviction. See United, States v. Nolasco-Rosas, 286 F.3d 762, 765 (5th Cir.2002); United States v. Moser, 123 F.3d 813, 819 (5th Cir.1997).

AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Moises Gutierrez-Castro
466 F. App'x 363 (Fifth Circuit, 2012)
United States v. Oscar Hilton-Romero
428 F. App'x 346 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)
United States v. Luis Allende-Garcia
407 F. App'x 829 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
207 F. App'x 499, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-smarr-ca5-2006.