United States v. Smalls

313 F. App'x 602
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Smalls. Read the opinion of the Court — 185 F. App'x 218
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 4, 2009·No. No. 08-6786·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

' PER CURIAM:

Mitchell Smalls appeals the district court’s order granting his motion filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006), and reducing his sentence from life imprisonment to 405 months. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible . error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Smalls, No. 2:96-cr-00131-RBS-2 (E.D.Va. Apr. 18, 2008); see United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247, 251 (4th Cir. [603]*6032009) (holding that § 3582 proceedings “do not constitute a full resentencing of the defendant”) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Smalls, 313 F. App'x 602 (4th Cir. 2009).

313 F. App'x 602 (United States v. Smalls) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Dunphy
551 F.3d 247 (Fourth Circuit, 2009)