United States v. Sledd

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 2, 2009
Docket09-6656
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Sledd (United States v. Sledd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Sledd, (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6656

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JOSHUA T. SLEDD,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge. (5:04-cr-30016-gec-5)

Submitted: August 26, 2009 Decided: September 2, 2009

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joshua T. Sledd, Appellant Pro Se. Jean Barrett Hudson, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Joshua T. Sledd appeals the district court’s order

denying his § 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction

of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Therefore we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. United States v. Sledd, No. 5:04-cr-30016-gec-5

(W.D. Va. March 27, 2009). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Sledd, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-sledd-ca4-2009.