United States v. Singletary

86 F. App'x 623
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Singletary. Read the opinion of the Court — 88 F. App'x 652
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 6, 2004·No. 03-7458·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

James Harrison Singletary appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to dismiss his indictment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Singletary, No. CR-98-240 (D.S.C. filed Aug. 21, 2003 & entered Aug. 22, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Singletary, 86 F. App'x 623 (4th Cir. 2004).

86 F. App'x 623 (United States v. Singletary) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.