United States v. Singletary
Opinion
James Harrison Singletary appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to dismiss his indictment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Singletary, No. CR-98-240 (D.S.C. filed Aug. 21, 2003 & entered Aug. 22, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
86 F. App'x 623 (United States v. Singletary) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.