United States v. Singletary

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Singletary

86 F. App'x 623

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 6, 2004

Docket03-7458

StatusUnpublished

This text of 86 F. App'x 623 (United States v. Singletary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Singletary, 86 F. App'x 623 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

James Harrison Singletary appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to dismiss his indictment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Singletary, No. CR-98-240 (D.S.C. filed Aug. 21, 2003 & entered Aug. 22, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

James Harrison Singletary appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to dismiss his indictment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Singletary, No. CR-98-240 (D.S.C. filed Aug. 21, 2003 & entered Aug. 22, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

86 F. App'x 623, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-singletary-ca4-2004.