Home/Fourth Circuit/United States v. Simpson

United States v. Simpson

37 F. App'x 618
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Simpson. Read the opinion of the Court — 27 F. App'x 221 →
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 6, 2002·No. No. 02-6280·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Alfredo Simpson appeals the district court’s orders denying his “Motion to Vacate Judgement[sic] Under Rule 12(b)(2)” and his Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion. We [619]*619have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Simpson, No. CR-90-67-3 (E.D.N.C. June 26, 2001; Oct. 16, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Simpson, 37 F. App'x 618 (4th Cir. 2002).

37 F. App'x 618 (United States v. Simpson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.