United States v. Simpson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6447

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

PETER SIMPSON, a/k/a Diamond, a/k/a Peter Pillings, a/k/a Clarence Floyd,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Robert Earl Maxwell, Senior District Judge. (CR-95-5, CA-98-166)

Submitted: July 22, 1999 Decided: July 27, 1999

Before ERVIN, HAMILTON, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Peter Simpson, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Oliver Mucklow, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Peter Simpson seeks to appeal the district court’s order de-

nying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1999).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the dis-

trict court. See United States v. Simpson, Nos. CR-95-5; CA-98-166

(N.D.W. Va. Jan. 28, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED