United States v. Simms

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Simms. Read the opinion of the Court — 50 F. App'x 127
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 8, 2002·No. 01-4991·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-4991

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

TIMOTHY EDWARD SIMMS, a/k/a DeNasty,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District Judge. (CR-97-355-WMN)

Submitted: September 20, 2002 Decided: November 8, 2002

Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael D. Montemarano, MICHAEL D. MONTEMARANO, P.A., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Robert Reeves Harding, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Timothy Simms appeals his 240 month sentence entered after

remand for resentencing on his conviction for conspiracy to

distribute narcotics, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 (2000), and

aiding and abetting, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2 (2000). The

Government has filed a motion which we construe as one for summary

affirmance.

We grant the Government’s motion for summary affirmance. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Simms, (4th Cir. 2002).

United States v. Simms (United States v. Simms) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Principals
18 U.S.C. § 2
Attempt and conspiracy
21 U.S.C. § 846