United States v. Simms
This text of United States v. Simms (United States v. Simms) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-4991
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
TIMOTHY EDWARD SIMMS, a/k/a DeNasty,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District Judge. (CR-97-355-WMN)
Submitted: September 20, 2002 Decided: November 8, 2002
Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael D. Montemarano, MICHAEL D. MONTEMARANO, P.A., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Robert Reeves Harding, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Timothy Simms appeals his 240 month sentence entered after
remand for resentencing on his conviction for conspiracy to
distribute narcotics, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 (2000), and
aiding and abetting, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2 (2000). The
Government has filed a motion which we construe as one for summary
affirmance.
We grant the Government’s motion for summary affirmance. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Simms, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-simms-ca4-2002.