United States v. Simms

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Simms

50 F. App'x 127

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 8, 2002·No. No. 01-4991·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Timothy Simms appeals his 240 month sentence entered after remand for resen[128]*128tencing on his conviction for conspiracy to distribute narcotics, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 (2000), and aiding and abetting, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2 (2000). The Government has filed a motion which we construe as one for summary affirmance.

We grant the Government’s motion for summary affirmance. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Timothy Simms appeals his 240 month sentence entered after remand for resen[128]*128tencing on his conviction for conspiracy to distribute narcotics, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 (2000), and aiding and abetting, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2 (2000). The Government has filed a motion which we construe as one for summary affirmance.

We grant the Government’s motion for summary affirmance. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Simms, 50 F. App'x 127 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

50 F. App'x 127 (United States v. Simms) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related