United States v. Simmons

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Simmons. Read the opinion of the Court — 374 F.3d 313
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 15, 2007·No. 05-40704·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH CIRCUIT February 15, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-40704 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LEKENA NEKOLE SIMMONS,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (2:03-CR-13-5)

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Lekena Nekole Simmons has

requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). A copy of counsel’s

motion was sent to Simmons at multiple addresses, and she has not

filed a response. Our review of counsel’s brief and the record

discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Counsel’s motion for

leave to withdraw is GRANTED; counsel is excused from further

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. responsibilities; and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R.

42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Simmons, (5th Cir. 2007).

United States v. Simmons (United States v. Simmons) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)