United States v. Simmons

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Simmons. Read the opinion of the Court — 340 F. App'x 141
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 22, 2010·No. 09-6038·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6038

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

ANTHONY GLENN SIMMONS,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (2:93-cr-00008-H-1)

Submitted: June 7, 2010 Decided: June 22, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Glenn Simmons, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. May- Parker, Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Anthony Glenn Simmons appeals the district court’s

order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for

reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. United States v. Simmons, No. 2:93-cr-

00008-H-1 (E.D.N.C. Dec. 5, 2008). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Simmons, (4th Cir. 2010).

United States v. Simmons (United States v. Simmons) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related