United States v. Silverman

439 F.2d 1198
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided December 11, 1970·No. Nos. 494, 561, Dockets 33584, 34392·Published·Cited by 27 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s petition for a rehearing suggests that our opinion makes an exception to the attorney-client confidential communication rules. This was not the intent of the opinion. To avoid any such impression, the paragraph of the decision filed July 1, 1970, reported in 430 F.2d at page 122 and reading “The privilege as commonly formulated [1199]*1199* * * ” and continuing to the paragraph on page 122 (right-hand column) reading “In view of the position * * in the opinion reported at 430 F.2d 106, is deleted. However, with respect to the Friedland report, we believe that under the circumstances it was properly received in evidence.

We have considered all the other grounds advanced in the petition for rehearing, and deny the petition except as noted above.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Silverman, 439 F.2d 1198 (2d Cir. 1970).

439 F.2d 1198 (United States v. Silverman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Thompson
141 F. Supp. 3d 188 (E.D. New York, 2015)
United States v. Larson
807 F. Supp. 2d 142 (W.D. New York, 2011)
United States v. Gotti
457 F. Supp. 2d 411 (S.D. New York, 2006)
In Re: Dow Corning Corporation
261 F.3d 280 (Second Circuit, 2001)
United States v. John Walsh
194 F.3d 37 (Second Circuit, 1999)
United States v. Sainato
33 F. Supp. 2d 155 (E.D. New York, 1998)
United States v. Nick Stavroulakis
952 F.2d 686 (Second Circuit, 1992)
United States v. Ellison M. Stockton
788 F.2d 210 (Fourth Circuit, 1986)
State v. Bell
480 A.2d 906 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1984)
United States v. Duff
529 F. Supp. 148 (N.D. Illinois, 1981)
United States v. August W. Durnin
632 F.2d 1297 (Fifth Circuit, 1980)
United States v. Boffa
513 F. Supp. 444 (D. Delaware, 1980)
United States v. Frank C. Marolda
615 F.2d 867 (Ninth Circuit, 1980)
United States v. Michael Capanegro
576 F.2d 973 (Second Circuit, 1978)
In re Ampicillin Antitrust Litigation
81 F.R.D. 377 (District of Columbia, 1978)