United States v. Silvano Garcia-Ibarra
This text of 686 F. App'x 271 (United States v. Silvano Garcia-Ibarra) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Adrian Gomez-Ureaba pleaded guilty to illegal reentry into the United States and received a within-guidelines sentence of 34 months in prison and a one-year term of supervised release. Silvano Garcia-Ibarra likewise pleaded guilty to illegal reentry, and he received a within-guidelines sentence of 18 months in prison and a three-year term of supervised release. Each appellant was sentenced in accordance with a determination that his prior Texas conviction for evading arrest with a motor vehicle amounted to an aggravated felony under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(C) (2014), which incorporates the definition of crime of violence found in 18 U.S.C. § 16(b).
First, the appellants argue that, in light of Johnson v. United States, - U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 2551, 192 L.Ed.2d 569 (2015), § 16(b) is facially unconstitutional. As they concede, this argument is foreclosed. See United States v. Gonzalez-Longoria, 831 F.3d 670, 677 (5th Cir. 2016) (en banc), petition for cert. filed (Sept. 29, 2016) (No. 16-6259). Their argument that § 16(b) is unconstitutional as applied to them likewise fails, as the standard of § 16(b) can be straightforwardly applied to their prior convictions. See Gonzalez-Long oria, 831 F.3d at 677-78; see also United States v. Sanchez-Ledezma, 630 F.3d 447, 450-51 (5th Cir. 2011).
Finally, their argument that Johnson casts doubt upon Sanchez-Ledezma is unpersuasive. Because the former case is not squarely on point with the latter, we will not revisit the latter. See United States v. Traxler, 764 F.3d 486, 489 (5th Cir. 2014); United States v. Alcantar, 733 F.3d 143, 145-46 (5th Cir. 2013).
AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir, R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
686 F. App'x 271, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-silvano-garcia-ibarra-ca5-2017.