United States v. Sherill

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: April 4, 2011
• Docket: 09-7030
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7030

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

BERNARD DONNELL SHERILL, a/k/a Nard,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, District Judge. (3:95-cr-00005-FDW-8)

Submitted: March 31, 2011 Decided: April 4, 2011

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Noell Peter Tin, TIN, FULTON, WALKER & OWEN, PLLC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Bernard Donnell Sherill appeals the district court’s

order granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United

States v. Sherill, No. 3:95-cr-00005-FDW-8 (W.D.N.C. May 22,

2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED