United States v. Shawn Leo Barth

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided November 5, 2018·No. 17-3792·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

No. 17-3792

United States of America,

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee,

v.

Shawn Leo Barth,

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant.

Appeal from United States District Court for the District of North Dakota - Bismarck

Submitted: October 12, 2018 Filed: November 5, 2018

[Unpublished]

Before COLLOTON, BOWMAN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Shawn Leo Barth appeals the district court’s1 denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). We agree with the district court that Barth

1 The Honorable Daniel L. Hovland, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of North Dakota.

was ineligible for the requested sentence reduction based on an amendment to the United States Sentencing Guidelines because his original sentence was derived from the applicable statutory minimum. See United States v. Long, 757 F.3d 762, 763-64 (8th Cir. 2014). We therefore affirm the district court’s order. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Shawn Leo Barth, (8th Cir. 2018).

United States v. Shawn Leo Barth (United States v. Shawn Leo Barth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Roland Long
757 F.3d 762 (Eighth Circuit, 2014)