United States v. Shawn Leo Barth
This text of United States v. Shawn Leo Barth (United States v. Shawn Leo Barth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 17-3792 ___________________________
United States of America,
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee,
v.
Shawn Leo Barth,
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant. ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the District of North Dakota - Bismarck ____________
Submitted: October 12, 2018 Filed: November 5, 2018 [Unpublished] ____________
Before COLLOTON, BOWMAN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM.
Shawn Leo Barth appeals the district court’s1 denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). We agree with the district court that Barth
1 The Honorable Daniel L. Hovland, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of North Dakota. was ineligible for the requested sentence reduction based on an amendment to the United States Sentencing Guidelines because his original sentence was derived from the applicable statutory minimum. See United States v. Long, 757 F.3d 762, 763-64 (8th Cir. 2014). We therefore affirm the district court’s order. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Shawn Leo Barth, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-shawn-leo-barth-ca8-2018.