United States v. Shaughnessy

210 F.2d 472
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Shaughnessy. Read the opinion of the Court — 221 F.2d 262
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided January 21, 1954·No. 22838·Published

Opinion

210 F.2d 472

UNITED STATES of American ex rel. Quirino PANES, Relator-Appellant,
v.
Edward J. SHAUGHNESSY, District Directo r, New York Port,
Immigration and Naturalization Service, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 93, Docket 22838.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Argued Han. 4, 1954.
Decided Jan. 21, 1954.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York; Edward Weinfeld, Judge.

Rosauro Gomez, Brooklyn, N.Y., for relator-appellant.

J. Edward Lumbard, U.S. Atty., New York City (Harold J. Raby, Asst. U.S. Atty., and Lester Friedman, Atty., Immigration and Naturalization Service, Dept. of Justice, New York City, of counsel), for respondent-appellee.

Before CHASE, Chief Judge, CLARK, Circuit Judge, and GIBSON, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Order affirmed on opinion below. Ex parte Andal, 118 F.Supp. 949.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Shaughnessy, 210 F.2d 472 (2d Cir. 1954).

210 F.2d 472 (United States v. Shaughnessy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ex parte Andal
118 F. Supp. 949 (S.D. New York, 1953)