United States v. Shaughnessy

210 F.2d 472
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedJanuary 21, 1954
Docket22838
StatusPublished

This text of 210 F.2d 472 (United States v. Shaughnessy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Shaughnessy, 210 F.2d 472 (2d Cir. 1954).

Opinion

210 F.2d 472

UNITED STATES of American ex rel. Quirino PANES, Relator-Appellant,
v.
Edward J. SHAUGHNESSY, District Directo r, New York Port,
Immigration and Naturalization Service, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 93, Docket 22838.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Argued Han. 4, 1954.
Decided Jan. 21, 1954.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York; Edward Weinfeld, Judge.

Rosauro Gomez, Brooklyn, N.Y., for relator-appellant.

J. Edward Lumbard, U.S. Atty., New York City (Harold J. Raby, Asst. U.S. Atty., and Lester Friedman, Atty., Immigration and Naturalization Service, Dept. of Justice, New York City, of counsel), for respondent-appellee.

Before CHASE, Chief Judge, CLARK, Circuit Judge, and GIBSON, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Order affirmed on opinion below. Ex parte Andal, 118 F.Supp. 949.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex parte Andal
118 F. Supp. 949 (S.D. New York, 1953)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
210 F.2d 472, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-shaughnessy-ca2-1954.