United States v. Shannon

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 25, 2008·No. 08-6409·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6409

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

PERNELL SHANNON, a/k/a Junior,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (6:02-cr-01360-HMH-5)

Submitted: July 22, 2008 Decided: July 25, 2008

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Pernell Shannon, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Jean Howard, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Pernell Shannon appeals the district court’s order

denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2000) motion. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.

Shannon, No. 6:02-cr-01360-HMH-5 (D.S.C. Mar. 7, 2008). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Shannon, (4th Cir. 2008).

United States v. Shannon (United States v. Shannon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related