United States v. Shannon
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6409
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
PERNELL SHANNON, a/k/a Junior,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (6:02-cr-01360-HMH-5)
Submitted: July 22, 2008 Decided: July 25, 2008
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Pernell Shannon, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Jean Howard, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Pernell Shannon appeals the district court’s order
denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2000) motion. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
Shannon, No. 6:02-cr-01360-HMH-5 (D.S.C. Mar. 7, 2008). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Shannon (United States v. Shannon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.