United States v. Sellers
This text of United States v. Sellers (United States v. Sellers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6914
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
FREDERICK LYNN SELLERS,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. C. Weston Houck, Senior District Judge. (4:01-cr-00058-CWH-1)
Submitted: September 22, 2009 Decided: October 1, 2009
Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Frederick Lynn Sellers, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Frederick Lynn Sellers appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion for sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. Sellers, No. 4:01-cr-
00058-CWH-1 (D.S.C. May 6, 2009). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Sellers, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-sellers-ca4-2009.