United States v. Sellers

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedOctober 1, 2009
Docket09-6914
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Sellers (United States v. Sellers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Sellers, (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6914

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

FREDERICK LYNN SELLERS,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. C. Weston Houck, Senior District Judge. (4:01-cr-00058-CWH-1)

Submitted: September 22, 2009 Decided: October 1, 2009

Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Frederick Lynn Sellers, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Frederick Lynn Sellers appeals the district court’s

order denying his motion for sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. United States v. Sellers, No. 4:01-cr-

00058-CWH-1 (D.S.C. May 6, 2009). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Sellers, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-sellers-ca4-2009.