United States v. Sean Fowlkes

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 15, 2013·No. 13-6130·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6130

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

SEAN DARNELL FOWLKES,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:10-cr-00332-CCB-1)

Submitted: June 24, 2013 Decided: July 15, 2013

Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sean Darnell Fowlkes, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Clayton Hanlon, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Sean Darnell Fowlkes appeals the district court’s

orders denying his motion to dismiss the indictment and his

motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Fowlkes,

No. 1:10-cr-00332-CCB-1 (D. Md. Nov. 19, 2012). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before this court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Sean Fowlkes, (4th Cir. 2013).

United States v. Sean Fowlkes (United States v. Sean Fowlkes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.