United States v. Sean Fowlkes
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-6130
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
SEAN DARNELL FOWLKES,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:10-cr-00332-CCB-1)
Submitted: June 24, 2013 Decided: July 15, 2013
Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sean Darnell Fowlkes, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Clayton Hanlon, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Sean Darnell Fowlkes appeals the district court’s
orders denying his motion to dismiss the indictment and his
motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Fowlkes,
No. 1:10-cr-00332-CCB-1 (D. Md. Nov. 19, 2012). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Sean Fowlkes (United States v. Sean Fowlkes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.