United States v. Sean Fowlkes

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 11, 2012·No. 12-6981·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6981

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

SEAN DARNELL FOWLKES,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:09-cr-00244-CCB-5)

Submitted: September 25, 2012 Decided: October 11, 2012

Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sean Darnell Fowlkes, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Clayton Hanlon, Assistant United States Attorney, Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Sean Darnell Fowlkes appeals the district court’s

order denying his motions for reconsideration and to alter or

amend the denial of his request for grand jury materials. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm. See Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v.

United States, 360 U.S. 395, 399-400 (1959); In re Grand Jury

Proceedings, 800 F.2d 1293, 1298-99 (4th Cir. 1986). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Sean Fowlkes, (4th Cir. 2012).

United States v. Sean Fowlkes (United States v. Sean Fowlkes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. United States
360 U.S. 395 (Supreme Court, 1959)
In Re Grand Jury Proceedings, Gj-76-4 & Gj-75-3
800 F.2d 1293 (Fourth Circuit, 1986)