United States v. Scott
Opinion
Case: 24-20321 Document: 46-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/05/2025
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED No. 24-20321 March 5, 2025 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce ____________ Clerk
United States of America,
Plaintiff—Appellee,
versus
Jeremy Jacobi Scott,
Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:12-CR-433-1 ______________________________
Before Wiener, Ho, and Ramirez, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jeremy Jacobi Scott has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Scott has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as
_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 24-20321 Document: 46-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/05/2025
No. 24-20321
Scott’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Scott (United States v. Scott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.