United States v. Scott
Opinion
Case: 24-10475 Document: 44-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/18/2024
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals No. 24-10475 Fifth Circuit
Summary Calendar FILED ____________ November 18, 2024 Lyle W. Cayce United States of America, Clerk
Plaintiff—Appellee,
versus
Chisanga Mable Scott,
Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:22-CR-422-2 ______________________________
Before Graves, Willett, and Wilson, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:* The attorney appointed to represent Chisanga Mable Scott has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Scott has filed a response and moved for the appointment of
_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 24-10475 Document: 44-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/18/2024
No. 24-10475
substitute counsel. That request is DENIED as untimely. See United States v. Wagner, 158 F.3d 901, 902–03 (5th Cir. 1998). We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Scott’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Scott (United States v. Scott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.