United States v. Scates

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: February 5, 2003
• Docket: 02-7712
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7712

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DAVID M. SCATES,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CR-98-87, CA-01-750)

Submitted: January 30, 2003 Decided: February 5, 2003

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David M. Scates, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Wiley Miller, Noelle Dalrymple, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

David M. Scates seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000).

We have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons stated by

the district court that Scates has not made a substantial showing

of the denial of a constitutional right. See United States v.

Scates, Nos. CR-98-87; CA-01-750 (E.D. Va. Oct. 29, 2002).

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED