United States v. Scarlett

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Scarlett

517 F. App'x 685

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedApril 18, 2013

DocketNo. 12-13949

StatusPublished

This text of 517 F. App'x 685 (United States v. Scarlett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Scarlett, 517 F. App'x 685 (11th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Clinton Deon Scarlett appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for a sentence reduction, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) and Amendment 750 to the Sentencing Guidelines, following his conviction for maintaining a drug-involved premise in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 856(a)(1). Because of the lack of clarity in the record, we vacate Scarlett’s original sentence and remand to the district court to resentence in accordance with Amendment 750.

VACATED and REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Clinton Deon Scarlett appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for a sentence reduction, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) and Amendment 750 to the Sentencing Guidelines, following his conviction for maintaining a drug-involved premise in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 856(a)(1). Because of the lack of clarity in the record, we vacate Scarlett’s original sentence and remand to the district court to resentence in accordance with Amendment 750.

VACATED and REMANDED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

517 F. App'x 685, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-scarlett-ca11-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack